翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Integrity (Modern Family)
・ Integrity (operating system)
・ Integrity (web agency)
・ Integrity 2000
・ Integrity Defines Strength
・ Integrity engineering
・ Integrity engineering audit
・ Integrity in Mobile Phone Financial Services
・ Integrity Inventory
・ Integrity management
・ Integrity Management Plan
・ Integrity Media Africa
・ Integrity Music
・ Integrity plan
・ Integrity Records
Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
・ Integrity testing
・ Integrity Title Insurance, Trust and Safe Deposit Company
・ Integrity Toronto
・ Integrity USA
・ Integrity Watch Afghanistan
・ Integrity, Technology & Service
・ Integritybc
・ Integro-differential equation
・ Integrodifference equation
・ Integromics
・ Integron
・ Integrous
・ Integrys Energy Group
・ Integrál-DAC


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk : ウィキペディア英語版
Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk

''Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk'', , was a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that time spent by workers waiting to undergo anti-employee theft security screenings is not "integral and indispensable" to their work, and thus not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The Court delivered their ruling on December 9, 2014.〔(【引用サイトリンク】 title=Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk )
==Background==
Jesse Busk was among several workers employed by the temp agency Integrity Staffing Solutions to work in Amazon.com's warehouse in Nevada to help package and fulfill orders. At the end of each day, they had to spend about 25 minutes waiting to undergo anti-theft security checks before leaving. Busk and his fellow workers sued their employer, claiming they were entitled to be paid for those 25 minutes under the Fair Labor Standards Act. They argued that the time waiting could have been reduced if more screeners were added, or shifts were staggered so workers did not have to wait for the checks at the same time. Furthermore, since the checks were made to prevent employee theft, they only benefited the employers and the customers, not the employees themselves.〔〔
The District Court originally dismissed the case, ruling that the security checks were made after the regular work shift and therefore not "an integral and indispensable part" of the job. The Ninth Circuit disagreed, ruling that the checks were necessary to
the principal work of the job.〔〔

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.